节点文献
碳减排约束下不同能源类型垃圾转运车适用性竞争力分析——以深圳市为例
Competitive Analysis of Suitability for Garbage Transfer Trucks with Different Energy Types Under Carbon Emission Reduction Constraints:A Case Study of Shenzhen City
【摘要】 以柴油、LNG、纯电动和氢能垃圾转运车为研究对象,从车辆的续航能力、全生命周期使用成本、碳排放水平、长期竞争力等不同维度对车辆的适用性进行综合对比研究。结果表明:纯电动转运车受限于续航里程短、充电时间长,在8 h连续工作时间内,其工作临界运距为23.7 km;基于全生命周期使用成本和未来碳价上涨趋势,相比于LNG转运车,短运距(≤23.7 km)情景下氢能和纯电动转运车的竞争力时间点分别为2030年和2050年;长运距(>23.7 km)情景下,氢能转运车竞争力时间点为2035年,但纯电动转运车长期不具备竞争优势;现阶段垃圾转运车清洁化替代方案宜采用“以气为主、电氢为辅”的策略,并以场景为导向构建差异化的综合能源补给设施。
【Abstract】 Diesel,liquefied natural gas(LNG),pure electric and hydrogen-powered garbage transfer trucks were chosen as the research objects. The applicability of different trucks from different dimensions,such as vehicle endurance,total cost of ownership,carbon emission and long-term competitiveness were comprehensively studied. The results showed that pure electric transfer truck had a critical working distance of 23.7 km within 8 hours operation period,due to the short battery range and long charging time. Considering the total cost of ownership and future trend of carbon price increase,hydrogen-powered and pure electric transfer trucks would achieve competitive parity with LNG transfer trucks by 2030 and2050 under short-distance(≤23.7 km)scenario. Under long-distance(>23.7 km)scenario,the competitive parity of hydrogen-powered transfer trucks would be 2035,but pure electric transfer trucks didn’t have competitive advantage for a long time. At present,the clean alternative of garbage transfer truck should prefer a“gas-primary,electric and hydrogen secondary”approach. And differentiated comprehensive energy supply facilities should be built based on scenario.
【Key words】 domestic waste; transfer; energy type; carbon emission; competitiveness;
- 【文献出处】 环境卫生工程 ,Environmental Sanitation Engineering , 编辑部邮箱 ,2024年03期
- 【分类号】U469.691;X705
- 【下载频次】39