【摘要】 光绪刻本《朔方备乘》是研究晚清边疆史地的重要专著，其对哈萨克、布鲁特、土尔扈特等西北边疆部落的记载为晚清士人所多次引用，成为传播西北边疆部族认知的重要著述，在传播知识的同时，其也将车凌乌巴什所属的部落前后混淆，对后世文献影响较深。究其原因，主要有三：一是《朔方备乘》原稿不存，底稿被毁，光绪刻本《朔方备乘》实为后人在残稿的基础上增撰而成。目前所见的《朔方备乘》讹误之处并非一定是何秋涛所撰；二是“异人同名”的现象增加了对历史人物研究的难度，书中不应简单地视为同一人，需要尽可能地综合考虑相关因素；三是书中将车凌乌巴什误述为属于土尔扈特部，这种错误认识的来源应为《钦定外藩蒙古回部王公表传》。更多还原

【Abstract】 The Guangxu woodblock "Shuo Fang Bei Cheng" is an important monograph on the study of the history and geography of the late Qing border regions.Its records of the northwest border tribes such as Kazakhs,Buruts,and Torguts have been repeatedly cited by late Qing scholars,becoming an important work for spreading the knowledge of the northwest border region.While spreading knowledge,it also confuses the tribe to which Tserin Ubashi belongs,having a profound impact on later literature.There are three principal reasons for this mistake.One is that the original manuscript of Shuo Fang Bei Cheng had been destroyed and was not extant when it was put to printing.The Guangxu edition of Shuo Fang Bei Cheng was actually a compilation by later scholars on the basis of an incomplete manuscript.This means the errors observed in today’s Shuo Fang Bei Cheng are not necessarily attributed to HE Qiutao.Secondly,the phenomenon of different people sharing the same name maybe increased the difficulty of studying historical figures.Persons in a book that should not simply be regarded as the same person ought to be put into comprehensive consideration factoring relevant factors as much as possible.Thirdly,the book mistakenly states that Tserin Ubashi was a Torgut.This erroneous understanding should take source from the Biography of the Princes of the Mongolian and Ho tong Tribes.更多还原