【摘要】 修订后的猥亵儿童罪中的各种加重情节的认定在司法实践中引发争议，其中，尤以“造成儿童伤害”型加重情节的认定分歧为甚。相关刑事判例表明，该项加重情节在司法实践中认定标准并不统一。究其根源，在于刑事立法沿革中形成的以“轻伤”作为标准的司法惯性干扰了具体个案的实质判断。通过梳理我国“伤害标准”司法惯性形成的刑事立法脉络并对关涉学说予以辨正、榷扬，兼从规范条文、规范性文件、量刑规定三元维度进行考察，猥亵儿童罪之“造成儿童伤害”情节的适用标准应当突破司法惯性的藩篱与桎梏，以“轻微伤”作为标准能更好实现未成年人合法权益的有效保障。此外，对于负有照护职责的人员猥亵儿童“造成儿童伤害”的，应当在加重刑量刑幅度内从重处罚。更多还原

【Abstract】 The revised aggravated circumstances under the crime of indecent assault on children have caused significant controversy in judicial practice, with the identification of aggravated circumstances that cause harm to children being particularly divergent. Relevant criminal precedents indicate that the criteria for determining the aggravating circumstances in judicial practice are not uniform. The root cause lies in the judicial inertia formed in the evolution of criminal legislation, which uses "minor injury" as the standard and interferes with the substantive judgment of specific cases. By sorting out the criminal legislative context formed by the judicial inertia of "injury standards" in China and distinguishing the relevant theories, and examining from the three dimensions of normative provisions, normative documents, and sentencing provisions, the applicable standards for the "causing child injury" circumstances of the crime of indecent assault on children should break through the barriers and shackles of judicial inertia, and consider adding "minor injuries" to better protect the legitimate rights and interests of minors. In addition, for personnel responsible for taking care of children who molest them and cause harm to them, they should be given a heavier punishment within the scope of the aggravating sentence.更多还原