【作者】 郭翔；

【导师】 章程；

【作者基本信息】 清华大学 ， 民商法， 2003， 硕士

【摘要】 二十世纪七十年代，世界第三次科技革命进入了一个新阶段，大量科学技术被应用于人们的生产和生活。随着科学技术的发展和人们生活的提高，录音资料、录像资料、计算机生成资料和其他高科技设备生成资料在社会生活中大量出现，成为一种能够反映案件事实或者与案件有关事实的信息资料。各种新类型信息资料的出现，给传统的民事诉讼造成了巨大的冲击。对此，各国纷纷做出回应，或修改原来的民事诉讼法、证据法，以原有的证据制度调整这些新类型证据，或通过制订专门的法律，以新的规则对这些新类型证据加以调整。我国《民事诉讼法》将这些新类型信息资料作为一种独立的证据种类加以规定，并以视听资料作为它们的名称。但自我国民事诉讼法将视听资料为一种独立的证据加以专门规定以来，对于视听资料的名称是否合适、视听资料的具体范围应如何划分等问题一直存在争议。由于视听资料出现的时间比较晚，相关的理论还不成熟，对视听资料的特点、视听资料与其他种类证据的关系、视听资料作为证据的基本要求等问题，人们也有不同的看法。尤其是近年来，随着人们对隐私权保护的重视，私录资料的合法性问题成为了人们关注的一个热点。但我国现行法律和司法解释中有关视听资料的规定并不完善，这就导致了实务界对有关视听资料的规定在理解上存在疑问，各地对视听资料类证据的态度并不统一。然而目前我国民事诉讼视听资料的理论研究还很不成熟，司法实务缺乏应有的理论来指导。立法上的缺陷和理论研究的不足，影响了视听资料作为一类独立证据发挥其应有的作用。司法实践迫切需要有成熟的理论来指导。因此从理论上分析民事诉讼视听资料的若干基本问题，建构我国民事诉讼视听资料的理论体系，已经成为当务之急。本文正是基于上述目的，从我国民事诉讼法对视听资料的规定入手，结合我国司法实际的具体情况，对视听资料的名称和范围进行了详细的分析，认为视听资料的名称具有相对合理性，其范围从解释论和立法论上可得出不同的结论。通过运用大陆法系民事诉讼法的基本理论解析了视听资料证据能力、形式证据力和实质证据力方面的基本要求。通过分析我国民事诉讼和司法解释对私录资料的规定，重新建构了我国私录资料合法性的判断标准。更多还原

【Abstract】 In the 1970s, the third revolution of science and technology reached a new era. Consequently, many technologies were put into practice in people’s work and life. With the development of science and technology and with the improvement of people’s life, audio material, visual material, computer-produced material and other high-tech material appear in people’s daily and have become able to demonstrate facts in a case and their relative aspects. As a result, these new materials have deeply affected the traditional civil procedure. In order to be adjusted to the new changes, some counties have tried to regulate these new materials either by amending their Civil Procedure Law or Evidence Law or by enacting new laws in this regard. In China, legislators have made these new materials a new and independent means of proof, namely audio-visual material, in China’s Civil Procedure Law. Since Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China regards audio-visual material as a separate means of proof, discussions have been made on whether the name of audio-visual material is suitable and on its specific range. Because the audio-visual material only appeared a few years ago and the theory on this topic is immature, people have different opinions about such issue as the nature of audio-visual material, the relation between audio-visual material and other means of proof, and the basic requirement of audio-visual material as a means of proof. Especially in recent years, since people pay more and more attention to the protection of the privacy, secret recording has become a hot topic.Because the rules on audio-visual material in China’s laws, regulations and judicial interpretations are not sufficient, there are so many problems about the understanding of those rules in practice that different courts have different attitudes to audio-visual material. In addition, the research on the theory of audio-visual material is not extensively conducted, and therefore there is no mature theory that can guide the judicial practice. The deficiency in law and in practice holds back the proper functioning of audio-visual material as a separate means of proof and the practice needs a better theory to follow. Therefore, in order to improve the theory on audio-visual material, it is necessary to analyze the problems in this field. To reach the above goal, this paper begins with the rules on audio-visual material in China Civil Procedure Law, and then, based on the judicial practice, analyzes the<WP=4>name and the range of audio-visual material. The author concludes, in this part, that the name of audio-visual material is fairly reasonable and the range of audio-visual material is different on a legal interpretation level and on a legislative level. Then, by using the civil procedure law theory continental law system, the author analyzes such issues on the audio-visual material as the admissibility, and its formal and substantive probative forces. In the end, the author, by analyzing prescription of audio-visual material in Civil Procedure Law and judicial interpretations, rebuild the standard of the validity of secret recording audio-visual material.更多还原