【作者】 徐若冰；

【导师】 向天渊；

【作者基本信息】 西南大学 ， 比较文学与世界文学， 2012， 硕士

【摘要】 莱辛与苏轼诗画观的异同表现在两大方面。首先,莱辛与苏轼诗画观提出的时代背景、关系主张、概念范畴、观念提出之初衷、诗画本体论基础以及诗画观念的表述形式等都有着巨大的差异。其次,莱辛与苏轼也存在着异中之同。两者都关注到了不同艺术形式之间的联系,莱辛也并未将诗画之间的界限绝对化,认为诗和画是绝缘的；苏轼同样也没有认为“诗即画,画即诗”,而是默认了诗画之间也存有差异。中西方的语言差异、图像差异以及思维方式差异,是形成莱辛与苏轼诗画观差异的深层原因,正是这诸多方面的差异致使莱辛主张诗画分离,而苏轼却主张“诗画一律”。更多还原

【Abstract】 The similarities and differences of Gottholod Ephraim Lessing and Su Shi’s Poetic View are in two aspects. Firstly, there are huge differences between Lessing and Su Shi’s Poetic View, such as background, the stands, the scope of the concept, the notion of a mind, poetry and painting, the ontological foundation as well as poetry and painting’s concept. Secondly, there are similarities between Lessing and Su Shi. Both of them are concerned about the links between different art forms. Lessing’s boundaries between the poetry and painting was not absolute, that is poetry and painting is not insulated; Su Shi also do not think that "Poetry is painting, drawing, namely poetry," but admitted there are also differences between them.Chinese and Western language’s differences, images’ differences and the differences in the way of thinking led to the Lessing advocating Poetry separation, Su Shi to promoting poetry and painting’s combination.更多还原