【摘要】 《伤寒杂病论》还是《伤寒卒病论》，迄今并未解决。从现存仲景书来由、杂卒疑案缘起、两宋前仲景书名演变、杂病源流、杂卒文字学、杂卒逻辑学等方面对杂卒疑案作了全面考证发现，宋代学者字讹说从各方面看都不能成立，仲景书原名应是《伤寒卒病论》。并对中医疾病体系的发展作了扼要的逻辑说明。更多还原

【Abstract】 So far, the contenttion on the title of Zhang Zhongjingi’s work, either Shang Han Za Bing Lun or Shang Han Cu Bing Lun, is still unsettled. The present paper probes this problem by several approaches, including the provenance of now extant ZhongJing’s book, the stemming of the mystery Za and Cu, the evolution of title of ZhongJing’ book before both Song Dynasties;the origin and development of miscellaneous disease; semantic of both Za and Cu. On the above basis, a comprehensive study has come to the conclusion that the “wrong character” hypothesis mentioned by Song scholars is groundless, and the correct title for Zhongjing’ work should read Shan Han Cu Bing Lun. The paper also discusses logicaly the development of nosological system in TCM.更多还原