【摘要】 目的 系统性分析成人危重患者转运质量评价指标，明确指标的分类、名称和内容，为临床实践和研究提供参考。方法 检索从建库至2024年9月5日的Pub Med、Cochrane Library、CINAHL、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、Web of Science的文献，将纳入的文献进行汇总、分析。结果 共纳入文献8篇，各项评价指标共计出现438次，其中结构指标136次（31.05%）、过程指标203次（46.35%）、结果指标99次（22.60%）。排名前5的二级指标分别是转运人员的配备、转运物资及装备、转运沟通、转运培训与考核、转运评估与准备。结论 现有的危重患者转运质量评价指标尚不够完善，应进一步规范、完善评价指标的名称和内容，充分考虑科学验证与临床应用，以确保其科学性与可行性。更多还原

【Abstract】 Objective To systematically analyze the evaluation indicators of transport quality in adult critically ill patients,clarify the classification,name and content of the indicators,and provide reference for clinical practice and research.Methods PubMed,Cochrane Library,CINAHL,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang Database,China Biology Medicine Literature Database and Web of Science were searched from the database establishment to September 5,2024,and the included literatures were summarized and analyzed.Results A total of 8 literatures were included,with a total of 438 evaluation indicators,of which 136 were structural indicators(31.05%),203 were process indicators(46.35%) and 99 were outcome indicators(22.60%).The top 5 secondary indicators are the equipment of transport personnel,transport materials and equipment,transport communication,transport training and assessment,and transport assessment and preparation.Conclusion The existing evaluation indexes of transport quality of critically ill patients are not perfect,and the name and content of evaluation indexes should be further standardized and improved,and scientific verification and clinical application should be fully considered to ensure its scientificity and feasibility.更多还原