【摘要】 政治是关于中国和中国文明的知识生产中的一个重要因素,但它的存在方式与东方主义和后殖民研究中的情形相当不同,人们往往很少意识到它的政治特性,或者即便是被发现,人们也会对其视而不见或者拒绝认识它的本质。因此,这一因素可以说是构成了中西研究中的政治无意识。这种政治无意识和詹明信的概念基本类似,但詹明信的观点针对的是文学文本的阅读和解释,因此并不完全适用于相对中立和客观的知识和学术研究。詹明信的政治无意识主要是指经济生产中的阶级意识及其在文学文本中的深层反映,而知识和学术生产中的政治无意识的核心是族群意识、国家意识以及国际意识的政治意识形态,是学术领域中现实政治、国际政治、地缘文化政治、身份政治和族群政治控制中西研究的无意识政治学。通过分析中西研究中一些引起巨大争议的个案,可以探讨无意识的政治学如何影响中西研究的学术导向和结果,并影响知识生产和学术评价。更多还原

【Abstract】 Essential in the production of knowledge about China and its civilization,politics is different from the orientalist and post-colonialist studies,in which people tend to be unaware of their political nature,or refuse to recognize its otherwise very evident essence.This thus constitutes what may be called the political unconsciousness in Chinese-Western studies,which seems similar to the fundamentals of Fredric Jameson.Since his idea of political unconsciousness mainly involves reading and interpretation of literary text,it may not be entirely applicable to relatively neutral and objective knowledge,as represented by academic studies.Whereas Jameson’s concept mainly refers to literary reflection of class consciousness in economic production,the political unconsciousness in knowledge and academic production has its core in a political ideology of ethnic,national,and international consciousness,thus becoming an unconscious politics that controls scholarly studies in terms of real politics,international politics,geo-cultural politics,identity politics and ethnic politics.By analyzing such cases as arousing great controversies,we can explore how the unconscious politics puts under its sway the academic orientation and findings of studies in both China and the West,and make clear how it affects knowledge production and evaluation.更多还原