【摘要】 《列子》真伪之辨历千百年,主伪、主亦真亦伪、主真,各言其是,争论不休,至今也没有定论。长期以来真伪论争几乎成了《列子》研究的唯一工作,这严重影响了《列子》思想及其价值的探讨,这对一部古籍来说是不公平的。《列子》真伪的不确定不能成为认识《列子》的绊脚石,我们应该在《列子》真伪梳理的基础上,甚至可以尝试在《列子》作为道家著述的基础上,对列子其人、《列子》其书、列子学派思想及其学术地位形成一个基础共识和基本定位,以便推动《列子》研究的深化。更多还原

【Abstract】 The authenticity of Lie Zi has been distinguished for thousands of years. Scholars hold different opinions on the authenticity of Lie Zi, and there is no final conclusion yet. For a long time, the debate on authenticity has almost become the only work in the study of Lie Zi, which seriously affects the discussion on Lie Zi′s thought and its value. This is unfair to an ancient book. The uncertainty of Lie Zi′s authenticity shouldn′t be a stumbling block to the study of Lie Zi. Based on combing the authenticity of Lie Zi or even on regarding Lie Zi as a Taoist scholarly work, we should try to form a basic consensus and basic orientation for the person Lie Zi, the book Lie Zi, the thought of Lie Zi school and its academic status in order to promote the deepening of Lie Zi′s research.更多还原