【摘要】 相对资源承载力的传统评价方法存在明显不足,主要是因为对相对综合资源承载力的含义认识不清和计算方法失当。采用2011年的实际数据,运用传统评价方法和TOPSIS方法分别对国内31个省市区的相对综合资源承载力进行实证研究。根据传统模型计算得到,新疆、西藏、内蒙古、青海、黑龙江、甘肃、宁夏、北京、天津、上海是资源相对富余地区,其他均为资源超载地区;而基于TOPSIS方法的评价结果,将31个省市区分为5类,其中,新疆和广东是第1类,资源承载力高,甘肃、山西、吉林、重庆、贵州、宁夏、海南7个省市属于第5类,资源承载力最低。因此,基于TOPSIS的相对综合资源承载力评价更为客观,更能体现承载力的原始含义。更多还原

【Abstract】 The traditional evaluation method for the relative synthetic resource loading capacity has obvious weaknesses due to ambiguous definition and unapt calculation. This paper,based on 2011 data,uses the traditional method and TOPSIS respectively,to study the loading capacities in 31 provinces. According to the traditional mode,resources are relatively surplus in Xinjiang,Tibet,Inner Mongolia,Qinghai,Heilongjiang,Gansu,Ningxia,Beijing,Tianjin and Shanghai,overloaded in the rest; however,from TOPSIS,five categories are classified,Xinjiang and Guangdong rank Category 1,with the highest loading capacity,Gansu,Shanxi,Jilin,Chongqing,Guizhou,Ningxia and Hainan rank Category 5,lowest in loading capacity. The latter one is more subjective,and can better embody the original meaning of loading capacity.更多还原