节点文献

鼓室内注射布地奈德治疗12岁以上儿童及成人分泌性中耳炎的长期疗效分析

Effect of intratympanic injection of budesonide for otitis media with effusion in adolescents and adults

  • 推荐 CAJ下载
  • PDF下载
  • 不支持迅雷等下载工具,请取消加速工具后下载。

【作者】 安平赵宇杨奉玲郑永波杜进涛娄麟

【Author】 AN Ping;ZHAO Yu;YANG Fengling;ZHENG Yongbo;DU Jintao;LOU Lin;Department of Otorhinolaryngology,Shang Jin Nan Fu Hospital of Chengdu;Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery,West China Hospital;Department of Otorhinolaryngology,Suining Central Hospital;

【机构】 成都上锦南府医院耳鼻喉科四川大学华西医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科遂宁市中心医院耳鼻喉科

【摘要】 目的:研究鼓室内注射布地奈德(BUD)治疗12岁以上儿童及成人分泌性中耳炎(OME)患者的长期疗效及对主观症状的改善情况。方法:将180例OME患者按照单盲、随机、平行对照原则分为BUD组、地塞米松注射液组(DEX对照组)和0.9%NaCl溶液组(NS对照组),分别行鼓室内注射BUD(0.5 mg/ml)、DEX(5mg/ml)、NS(1ml),每周1次,同时记录每次治疗情况和患者主观症状评分,直至治愈或退出,治疗结束后随访3年。使用生存曲线图分析3组患者疗效差别,使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)比较3组患者主观症状改善程度。结果:在控制了病程、抽出液体体积与抽出液体性状及其他因素的作用后,治疗方式为BUD组的患者治疗结果无效或复发的危险性是NS对照组患者的0.131倍(95%CI 0.053-0.354)。生存曲线示BUD组96.6%(57/59)的患者有效保持时间为3个月以上,83.1%(49/59)的患者有效保持时间为1年以上,81.4%(48/59)的患者有效保持时间为3年以上;DEX对照组73.2%(41/56)的患者有效保持时间为3个月以上,46.4%(26/56)的患者有效保持时间为1年以上,42.9%(24/56)的患者有效保持时间为3年以上;NS对照组50.8%(33/65)的患者有效保持时间为3个月以上,26.2%(17/65)的患者有效保持时间为1年以上,20.0%(13/65)的患者有效保持时间为3年以上。3种药物鼓室内注射对于OME的纵向疗效从高到低依次为BUD、DEX、NS(P<0.05)。BUD组在改善耳闷症状方面优于DEX组和NS组,同时前两者改善主观症状和提高生活质量方面均优于NS组(P<0.05)。试验过程中未出现严重并发症及后遗症。结论:鼓室内注射BUD是治疗12岁以上儿童及成人OME患者长期、有效和安全的治疗方法。

【Abstract】 Objective:To assess the longitudinal curative effect and improvement of subjective symptoms by using intratympanic injection of budesonide(BUD)for OME patients over 12 years old and adults.Method:One hundred and eighty patients who were diagnosed as OME were recruited.A single-blind,randomized,parallel-control prospective study was performed.Dexamethasone(DEX)and sodium chloride(NS)were served as controls.The patients were randomly assigned into three groups,which respectively received intratympanic injection of BUD(0.5mg/ml),DEX(5mg/ml)or 0.9% NS solution(1ml)once a week.Survival analysis was applied to compare the longitudinal curative effect among the three groups.Meanwhile,seven main subjective symptoms were scored by 10-point visual scale(VAS)and physician’s evaluations were preformed during treatment and follow-up.Result:After adjustement for course of disease,volume and characters of effusion,the relative risk(RR)of BUD was0.131(95%CI0.053-0.354)when compared with NS.Survival curve showed,in BUD group,about 96.6%(57/59)of patients maintained effectiveness more than 3months,83.1%(49/59)were more than 1year,and 81.4%(48/59)of the patients could sustain longer than 3years.In DEX group,73.2%(41/56)of patients showed effectiveness more than 3months,46.4%(26/56)were more than 1year,and 42.9%(24/56)of the patients could sustain longer than 3years.While in NS group,50.8%(33/65)of the patients showed effectiveness more than 3months,26.2%(17/65)were more than 1year,and 20.0%(13/65)of the patients could sustain longer than 3years.Survival curve demonstrated that the rank of longitudinal therapeutic efficacy was BUD,DEX and NS(P<0.05).Both BUD and DEX showed improvements in subjective symptoms and quality of life(except for mental stress)compared with NS(P<0.05).In the aspect of improving the symptom of stuffy ear,BUD showed advantage over both DEX and NS.During and after treatment,no serious complications or sequelae were observed.Conclusion:Intratympanic injection with BUD for OME patients showed advantages in improving long-term therapeutic efficacy,it was a safe as well as effective intervention for children over age of 12 and adults suffering from OME.

  • 【文献出处】 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志 ,Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery , 编辑部邮箱 ,2017年16期
  • 【分类号】R764.21
  • 【网络出版时间】2017-08-09 15:31:34
  • 【下载频次】36
节点文献中: 

本文链接的文献网络图示:

本文的引文网络